[squeegee]

Originally Posted by tonypep

Can't see why this is of importance to anyone except the involved parties.

The story should only be of importance to the involved parties, however the comments made obviously intend to shape the opinions of others (negatively).

It's one of the things I see go on that most annoys me with forums, semi-slanderous comments with nothing to substantiate. If you have say 80% market share and $800K in your pocket, do you really need to continue on the offensive??

I stay off the other board for the same reason, funny thing is when it's Rich it's instantly hush-hush, wonder why that is?

Maybe Marcodie's side of the story is different? I suspect it is.

[californiadreamin]

Originally Posted by squeegee

The story should only be of importance to the involved parties, however the comments made obviously intend to shape the opinions of others (negatively).

It's one of the things I see go on that most annoys me with forums, semi-slanderous comments with nothing to substantiate. If you have say 80% market share and $800K in your pocket, do you really need to continue on the offensive??

I stay off the other board for the same reason, funny thing is when it's Rich it's instantly hush-hush, wonder why that is?

Maybe Marcodie's side of the story is different? I suspect it is.

My response was that Sonny shared his opinion. He attacked
no one. To have Rich Hoffman's innuendo to Sonny and Marcodie(USA)
Is Border line Liable. Is this how the new investors/owners of M&R
Feel??? Or is this Rich Hoffmans position? If there is a real "issue" with
Marcodie USA, it should be handled through our legal system. I feel that
Marcodie USA might be producing a good product, otherwise a veniomous
attack would not have happened on a public forum. I have no idea on
a lawsuit with M&R and the old Marcodie(Europe). I could care less. I do
Strongly feel that in the past, that ANY perceived strong competition for M&R has
been dealt with a "Chicago Thug, Strong Arm Position". Not good for this
or ANY industry. I hope that the new investor/owners change this style of
operation, for the health of their acquisition as well of the screen print industry.
Happy Printing
Winston

[244]

Originally Posted by californiadreamin

My response was that Sonny shared his opinion. He attacked
no one. To have Rich Hoffman's innuendo to Sonny and Marcodie(USA)
Is Border line Liable. Is this how the new investors/owners of M&R
Feel??? Or is this Rich Hoffmans position? If there is a real "issue" with
Marcodie USA, it should be handled through our legal system. I feel that
Marcodie USA might be producing a good product, otherwise a veniomous
attack would not have happened on a public forum. I have no idea on
a lawsuit with M&R and the old Marcodie(Europe). I could care less. I do
Strongly feel that in the past, that ANY perceived strong competition for M&R has
been dealt with a "Chicago Thug, Strong Arm Position". Not good for this
or ANY industry. I hope that the new investor/owners change this style of
operation, for the health of their acquisition as well of the screen print industry.
Happy Printing
Winston

Winston if you want to know exactly what happened feel free to call the Chicago Thug to get the real information. I am sure you have all my contact info!