DigitSmith

Print Stroke Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 27th, 2011, 09:33 PM   #1 (permalink)
screenmachines screenmachines is offline
Member

screenmachines's Avatar
Join Date:
May 2011
Location:
US
Posts:
47
Liked:
6 times
Default Re: Printex versus M&R comparison thread

I can get about 1 3/4" to 2" more out of the M&R diamondback. So they advertise 20" and I can get more.
Send a private message to screenmachines Contact
Old June 28th, 2011, 09:58 AM   #2 (permalink)
srimonogramming srimonogramming is offline
Senior Member

srimonogramming's Avatar
Join Date:
Feb 2009
Location:
Round Rock, Texas
Posts:
315
Liked:
96 times
Default Re: Printex versus M&R comparison thread

They thread yesterday got me thinking so I went out and measured what we can print on our press, which is 21" total and 20" with still getting everything flooded properly. It's listed to print 16x18, which could very well be a typo or a conservative number.
Send a private message to srimonogramming Contact
Old June 28th, 2011, 10:11 AM   #3 (permalink)
inkman996 inkman996 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date:
Dec 2009
Posts:
421
Liked:
117 times
Default Re: Printex versus M&R comparison thread

I would assume that most manufactures are conservative on their numbers because they dont want some knucklehead printing with extreme angles or something and complaining the press does not print as advertised. I know on my Javelin I also got two more inches more than advertised.
Send a private message to inkman996 Contact
Old June 28th, 2011, 10:19 AM   #4 (permalink)
tonypep tonypep is offline
Senior Member
Join Date:
Sep 2010
Posts:
165
Liked:
10 times
Default Re: Printex versus M&R comparison thread

Thats a relatively correct statement. Once you get comfortable with an auto you can find ways to "exploit" its capacity beyond advertised specs. Carefully I might add.
Send a private message to tonypep Contact
Old June 30th, 2011, 12:34 PM   #5 (permalink)
Screentex Screentex is offline
Member

Screentex's Avatar
Join Date:
May 2011
Location:
Waco, Tex
Posts:
92
Liked:
0 times
Default Re: Printex versus M&R comparison thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by inkman996
I have been thinking about what Robert says about comparing the two presses. I decided to start a little thread on comparing the two since I run one. One of the things I get frustrated the most with the Printex is its inability to print 20" as advertised. This made me think why is it the Sportsman that Brandt has can print 22"? Not to mention the footprint on the same press six color is actually less than the hurricane I have. So lets compare the two and see what is different.


What is one thing that is extremely important to all printers buying an auto? That is print area. The more the better for 90% of us. With that thinking a manufacturer should always have it in their mind to engineer their product as efficiently as possible to utilize all space available.

In the first picture below the red arrow is pointing at a steel plate jutting out from the front of the print carriage. this plate becomes the mechanical stop for the carriage, it can not travel any further once it hits that plate. Now on the Sportsman there is nothing in front on the carriage so their carriage can travel right up to the choppers, on the Printex it stops almost two inches before the choppers. I could conservatively cut one inch off that plate and gain all the travel. (note the sportsman pic is last but hard to see)


In this picture you see a shiny plate that the air hoses are mounted to. This becomes the rear mechanical stop. Now on the Sportsman there is nothing behind the choppers. I would remount the air lines to the middle farther in and pick up an easy inch or more.


Now in this picture you see the steel plate that the rear hanger hangs from. You should notice it is tee shaped. The part of the plate with the hanger bolts sticks out several inches from the center t part. On the sportsman it is just one long plate with everything mounted off of it. That rear hanger plate is the rear mechanical stop the farther out it juts the less travel for the carriage. If that plate was fabricated so everything was on one plane you would pick up a good two inches.






I added some extra pics of the sportsman someone was gracious enough to provide me. All you have to do is look in front and behind the print carriage and see how it is different. Another thing I know now is the M&R machine has the front drive wheel for the belt well behind the front hanger unlike on the Printex the drive wheel extends out in front of the hanger hence losing more travel distance.



In conclusion what I see is this, Printex purports easier to work on and I agree in some elements. What is not taken into account is that M&R utilized every inch of space available by burying certain things, a bit harder to access but you get more print stroke.

Hopefully this was educational and the thread survives. I will cross post it as well on some other sites.
I definatley agree on the more the better you get for the price. Most printers are more than likley not printing that big. We do VERY seldom. But we do have the capability and it is nice to have that option. It could give you a niche others can't reproduce. Just depends if you really need it.

In this picture the red arrow is pointing to the more and the better. I think it is probably a non-standard upgrade though.

Please continue and you guys try to play nice!!!
Attached Thumbnails
Print Stroke Discussion-boobs.jpg  
__________________
Draggin' ink since 1994!!
www.screentexgraphics.com
Send a private message to Screentex Contact
Closed Thread



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M&r Challenger 14 Color 35 Inch Print Stroke $17,000 printit Old Screen Printing Ads 1 May 20th, 2011 10:56 AM
Anatol 20 Head Vindicator Press-2008 ShellieGreer Old Screen Printing Ads 6 November 10th, 2009 12:52 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 AM.
Copyright © 2011 DigitSmith. All rights reserved.
Forums software by VBulletin, Copyright © 2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.