RPM Revolution Features

prozyan · September 14th, 2012, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cucumber Way

2
Yeah ... Apparently only negative spamming of the new 2M product is allowed here ... any effort to combat the negativity is deleted (funny how that works in some industries)

pushing ink · September 14th, 2012, 03:08 PM

If Barnes's technolgy is so cutting edge and the best, why can't he sell more than 6 presses a year? If the new technology was all that M&R would have had it or bought the right's, its not so they stick with what works.

srimonogramming · September 14th, 2012, 03:12 PM

If you don't consider posting 80 videos in one day spamming then by all means, you must not have spammed!!! It really is funny isn't it? How could someone be treated like that for no reason? Yeah, you got hammered when you posted, but spamming the forum doesn't make it right. You have to stop being a prick to not be treated like one, it's a two-way street Roberto. A professional courtesy was given and you once again ruined it yourself, it wasn't Brandt, JMD, Gilligan or any other guys that ruined it for you...just you. Just move on and forget about this, you're simply not cut out to promote via a forum where the members are educated on your past...that's all I can say. You cannot take the criticism for long enough to gain any respect from anyone and get on people's good side, you don't have it in you so why even go down this road again.

GraphicDisorder · September 14th, 2012, 03:23 PM

The good news about Robert is, much like this industry, there is no real place for him here on this or any relative industry forum.

http://www.digitsmith.com/f18-announcement3.html

GraphicDisorder · September 14th, 2012, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ScreenPrintInfo

Please post a link where "the court says M&R is right"

The one the people that keep claiming "prior art" are scared to file. Maybe because they know they wont win. Interesting. What's a matter, you yella.

srimonogramming · September 14th, 2012, 03:51 PM

I don't know if it's just not worth a fight, or everyone recognizes the patent owner as legal and legit, but I did see an ad in an old, old trade rag with a press that had data storage. I just can't remember who made the machine, whether it was an older Advance, Elexon, MHM or what manufacturer. I was told the magazine was early 90's but without seeing that part with my own eyes it's purely speculation and not really worth arguing about. Look, the feature would benefit some presses, others not at all, and some couldn't use the feature because of the technology running them, it is what it is and it hasn't been a factor in anyone's buying decision in a long time I don't think. For a press that stores settings digitally, I think we all agree it would be a pretty cool feature to have. We have a lot of repeat jobs, some of our customers just cannot see the savings by ordering 1000 shirts at once instead of 100 every month so we are constantly setting up a job that we've done a few weeks before. Typing in some numbers to recall those job settings would save some time for sure. It helps a lot on the Sprint International when we go from cotton tees to tote bags, back to 100% poly then safety vests.

inkman996 · September 14th, 2012, 03:59 PM

M&R is smart enough to protect patents they own even if they do not currently use them, the point is eventually you may implement them on a new release different technology etc.

vicb · September 14th, 2012, 04:47 PM

Not sure if this is a full list but I don't see anything "memory"
http://www.patentgenius.com/assignee...ipmentInc.html

CustomizedPrintables · September 14th, 2012, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by srimonogramming

I was really wanting that data storage feature when we were looking for a press and right about the time we were buying is when Rick had to stop working on the feature addition. It would have been very cool to load a specific job's settings and everything just be set. I thought MHM's had that feature?

Alan, unless I'm missing something, what good would data storage do (I'm presuming data storage primarily of screen location/registration like I see on the MHM 4000 (don't think it's on the standard S Type?)) unless you catalogued and re-used the same screens. This isn't the case in most shops I know of, primarily because of tension loss in screens (and because of expensive retensionables being used -- can't afford 2,000 of them to sit there in a screen library) and secondarily because of limited space. So, aside from being able to re-register a job that's been used before on the exact same screen/exact same exposure, thus securing the exact same location on the screen as the original job, what meaningful good is data storage? Plugging in digital pressure, angle, speed and off contact, etc. is so easy if you have those parameters written on the jobs folder, that that's the only thing I see data storage helping with. Am I missing the obvious here?

Brian

srimonogramming · September 14th, 2012, 05:00 PM

look under Elexon maybe?